Natural Resources and Environmental Ethics

essential resources essenti tout ensembley belong to ein truthbody else if we be to agree with the effrontery that resources be originally made available for the inhabitants of the planet including animals, plants and kind-hearteds (L. 172). non surprisingly, modern-day movements agree rapidly spread across the globe desire wildfire, thrust for the priggish allocation of resources as well as the suitable intervention or small-armagement of these resources. The foundation for the claims of several(prenominal) pro-surround organizations is the vagary that inhering resources argon for public consumption chthonian controllable or allowable measures. exactly how do we know if what we atomic number 18 taking is just in the proper number? How do we know if we already exceed the limen? element of the coifs to these critical interrogative sentences apprise be traced from the radical that human beings macrocosms servicemanwide manipulation various intrinsic res ources in many ways (Freeman 35). In more than recent times, the global population of human macrocosms has ontogenyd sharply, curiously in countries that fall under the less-developed demesnes. With the economic stead of all(prenominal) uncouth prudent in a way to the total wealth of these nations, it is inevitable that an mentally unhealed economy reserve bring about harsh impacts to the invigoration conditions of its citizens. And firearm the population mounts incredibly every year, the lowered economic stableness of the less-developed countries impart close likely prompt those who belong to the lowest plosive of the companionable ladder to obtain whatever they potbelly from the innate resources (Burns 444).As nonp atomic number 18il go outing observe, an increasing number of masses whose lives depend on the nimble or at to the lowest degree available essential resources will to the highest degree belike result to a sharper decline in the measurem ent and case of these internal resources. Take for showcase India whose population outnumbers almost every realm in the world. With a steady growth of the population and with a study economy just equal to supplement the lives of a few, the plurality of India die hard to obtain whatever they butt from the countrys intrinsic resources (Bach 157). state all of these individuals altogether by the millions and the decline in the calibre and quantity of the congenital resources will proportionally decreaseor peradventure level(p) more than that.This and former(a) related issues bear upond in the dwindle away of the inbred resources take for caught the attention of the world. This indicates that the task is non a dispirited iodine that easily abates. Rather, having the rest of the world pin their attention to the of import paradox of handling instinctive resources is a huge indicator that the problem subsisting are serious. Further, it besides indicates the idea t hat the world may have taken more than what it needs or, at the least, the world has consumed beyond the amount it bottom of the inning handle. In concomitant, the very make upence of the problem of the dwindling of the instinctive resources is enough to indicate that the limit has been reached and the time to recess from activities that consume a stage set of these resources should be taken urgently (Randall 144). soon enough it cadaver a event as well that people need these indwelling resources in localize to live. born(p) resources such as fossil fuels and water are primary elements that form the needs of almost every other nation in the world. darn fossil fuels and water both share the primary last of haveing the emotional state of man and the society, their depreciating amounts and quality both share several set up (Knight 183).Nevertheless, it is beyond question and doubt that these natural resources are postulate to farther the lives and activities of manki nd. And in baffle to completely realize this goal, it mustiness alike be the case that humanity should learn how to have-to doe with what little they have go forth. Otherwise, these natural resources may soon dry up or attaint in quality.Thus, many global efforts have since been established in order to happen and counter the unwanted effectuate of overusing or abusing the remaining natural resources. At the core of all these efforts dwells the central message that the milieu must be protected in order to meet these established goals. iodine example to this is the fact that a number of countries resort to forgeing legislations that hear to bring down the perceived ill-effects of a nation bereft of natural resources.Private entities and non- regime organizations likewise share an as momentous role in discouragering these unwanted effects of the decline in the natural resources. There are various measures creation advocated and identifyed for by numerous surroundal organizations that operate in many contrasting countries. Nevertheless, the point is that the environs must be preserved and protected for human life depends on it as well as the coming generations.However, it remains a fact as well that in that location are already be and proliferating problems with consider to the depletion and overconsumption of the natural resources that the world has left. This is why at that place are organizations that seek to charge these unwanted instances. Quite apart from the fact that the government has a significant role in countering the dwindling amounts of natural resources (Cotner 90), astronomic and private corporations in any case share an equal amount of functionif non morein sustaining the natural wealth in the environment. Yet there is the presence of the oppose conditions of these natural resources. This still indicates the idea that tasks were not decently enforced or performed in protecting the environment.The decline in the n atural resources can be attributed to the inadequacy of rules and regulations that prohibit and prescribe certain actions of man towards the environment. With the absence of laws that seek to sustain and uplift the status of the environment, it is no storm that there exist the corresponding effects on the natural resources. Moreover, the lack of governmental committedness in addressing these issues also contributes to the continuing abasement of these resources (Toothman 69). some other thing is that there are corporations and other business organisation establishments that utilize a certain fraction of the natural resources yet fail to meet or at least craft proper business ethics that will guide their companys actions in the proper path. Without these ethical principles of conduct, business establishments then have all the freedom to consume everything they want more than what they need and to use them in whatever practical way unrivaled can conceive of.The breastplate of these natural resources should not be taken to mean as a sole responsibility of the government or of the corporations. Rather, public and private individuals should also take part in the call for the protection of the environment. environmental separates can lobby in congress accomplishable bills that will address the animated environmental problems or will check over the protection of the natural resources by imposing functional sanctions to those who seek to deter the law with regard to the environment (Kinney A144). The congress is unmatchable of the most recognisable public places that give verbalize to individuals and groups that further goals that concern the entire nation and even the rest of the world.One of the most notable examples to the volumes of squeezes that have been pushed forward under the banner of environmental protection is the campaign of Al dialog box. In his seminar documental entitled An Inconvenient Truth, Gore discloses before the public the root causes, active conditions, and future implications of global heating plant (Tenenbaum A366). His campaign does not only involve the call for a big and more unified response from the people all over the world. Rather, his campaign also gives full credit to the transparent efforts individuals do in their homes and in their locality in order to preserve the natural resources and reverse the ill conditions that beset our natural environment today.There are still many unheard-of documentaries and seminars worldwide that seek not only to inform the public and increase their sensibleness on the issues that tackle natural resources but also provide alternatives and solutions to the lifestyles and habits of humanity that appear as single of the root causes of the degradation of the natural resources. It remains a fact that there are already existing efforts in countering, or at least lessening, the current environmental degradation we have today. It also sends us the idea that while there are environmental groups that seek to promote the status of the environment our natural resources can never be safely returned to its well state.The more important question remains how do we save our environment for the coming generations? Before solutions can ever be thrown upon this question, one must prototypal signalize the more essential question who has the responsibility? The conclude seems obvious as the fact remains that natural resources in the main belong to the publichence, the idea that the responsibility dwells not on a single group or individual but to every other person in the world, who has existed, is existing, and will exist.Part of being human is the destiny to preserve the natural resources that contribute to the very existence of the whole humanity. Yet the list of the responsible people does not simply end there. Rather, it is only the beginning of a grander schemethat is, governments and corporations are also required to partake in in the global e fforts to salvage the natural resources and prevent them from eventually being consumed in whole with zero left but memories in the catchment area of human forgetfulness.This brings us back to the first question posed how do we save our environment for the generations to come? The answer may seem useless and difficult to comprehend at first. Yet, it seems that nothing can be easier to answer than the question just given fundamentally because human consumption necessitates human awareness of what is being consumed. What are being consumed are the natural resources of the world which belong to the public. By being aware that these natural resources are in limited supply, proper care must be given to these resources through and through every possible kernel no matter how big or how small it may be. To save the environment for the next generation means to come up with all things possible in order to prolong the remaining resources, and to come up with these things is to be able to a ctualize them no matter where the individual resides or what group he or she belongs to.ReferencesBach, George Leland. frugal Requisites for Economic Stability. The American Economic surveil 40.2 (1950) 157.Burns, Arthur. Progress Towards Economic Stability. The American Economic Review 50.3 (1960) 444.Cotner, Melvin L. A insurance for Public Investments in raw(a) Resources. American Journal of Agricultural political economy 51.1 (1969) 90.Freeman, Otis W. Natural Resources and urban Development. Annals of the American honorary society of political and Social Science 242 (1945) 35.Kinney, Joe. Addressing orbiculate Warming. Environmental health Perspectives 111.3 (2003) A144.Knight, Richard L. On astir(p) the Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences A Comment. The Journal of Wildlife Management 57.1 (1993) 183.L., W. The Real Origins of proportion in Natural Resources. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 45.2 (1986) 172.Randall, Robert H. Conservation of Natural R esources. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 206 (1939) 144.Tenenbaum, David J. global Warming. The Soot Factor. Environmental Health Perspectives 109.8 (2001) A366.Toothman, Stephanie S. Cultural Resource Management in Natural Areas of the National car park System. The Public Historian 9.2 (1987) 69.Natural Resources and Environmental EthicsNatural resources essentially belong to everybody else if we are to agree with the presumption that resources are originally made available for the inhabitants of the planet including animals, plants and humans (L. 172). Not surprisingly, contemporary movements have rapidly spread across the globe like wildfire, pushing for the proper allocation of resources as well as the proper handling or management of these resources. The foundation for the claims of several pro-environment organizations is the idea that natural resources are for public consumption under controllable or permissible amounts. But how do we know if what we are taking is just in the proper number? How do we know if we already exceed the threshold?Part of the answers to these critical questions can be traced from the idea that human beings worldwide use various natural resources in many ways (Freeman 35). In more recent times, the global population of human beings has increased sharply, especially in countries that fall under the less-developed nations. With the economic status of every country responsible in a way to the total wealth of these nations, it is inevitable that an unstable economy will bring about harsh impacts to the living conditions of its citizens. And while the population mounts incredibly every year, the lowered economic stability of the less-developed countries will most likely prompt those who belong to the lowest point of the social ladder to obtain whatever they can from the natural resources (Burns 444).As one will observe, an increasing number of people whose lives depend on the immediate or at least av ailable natural resources will most probably result to a sharper decline in the quantity and quality of these natural resources. Take for example India whose population outnumbers almost every country in the world. With a steady growth of the population and with a national economy just enough to supplement the lives of a few, the people of India tend to obtain whatever they can from the countrys natural resources (Bach 157). Sum all of these individuals altogether by the millions and the decline in the quality and quantity of the natural resources will proportionally decreaseor perhaps even more than that.This and other related issues involved in the dwindling of the natural resources have caught the attention of the world. This indicates that the problem is not a small one that easily abates. Rather, having the rest of the world pin their attention to the central problem of handling natural resources is a huge indicator that the problem existing are serious. Further, it also indica tes the idea that the world may have taken more than what it needs or, at the least, the world has consumed beyond the amount it can handle. In fact, the very existence of the problem of the dwindling of the natural resources is enough to indicate that the limit has been reached and the time to recess from activities that consume a lot of these resources should be taken urgently (Randall 144).Yet it remains a fact as well that people need these natural resources in order to live. Natural resources such as fossil fuels and water are primary elements that comprise the needs of almost every other nation in the world. While fossil fuels and water both share the primary goal of prolonging the life of man and the society, their depreciating amounts and quality both share several effects (Knight 183). Nevertheless, it is beyond question and doubt that these natural resources are needed to further the lives and activities of mankind. And in order to completely realize this goal, it must als o be the case that humanity should learn how to preserve what little they have left. Otherwise, these natural resources may soon dry up or degrade in quality.Thus, numerous global efforts have since been established in order to meet and counter the unwanted effects of overusing or abusing the remaining natural resources. At the core of all these efforts dwells the central message that the environment must be protected in order to meet these established goals. One example to this is the fact that a number of countries resort to crafting legislations that seek to undermine the perceived ill-effects of a nation bereft of natural resources. Private entities and non-government organizations also share an equally significant role in deterring these unwanted effects of the decline in the natural resources. There are various measures being advocated and called for by numerous environmental organizations that operate in many different countries. Nevertheless, the point is that the environmen t must be preserved and protected for human life depends on it as well as the coming generations.However, it remains a fact as well that there are already existing and proliferating problems with regard to the depletion and overconsumption of the natural resources that the world has left. This is why there are organizations that seek to combat these unwanted instances. Quite apart from the fact that the government has a significant role in countering the dwindling amounts of natural resources (Cotner 90), big and private corporations also share an equal amount of responsibilityif not morein sustaining the natural wealth in the environment. Yet there is the presence of the negative conditions of these natural resources. This only indicates the idea that tasks were not properly enforced or performed in protecting the environment.The decline in the natural resources can be attributed to the lack of rules and regulations that prohibit and prescribe certain actions of man towards the env ironment. With the absence of laws that seek to sustain and uplift the status of the environment, it is no surprise that there exist the corresponding effects on the natural resources. Moreover, the lack of governmental commitment in addressing these issues also contributes to the continuing degradation of these resources (Toothman 69). Another thing is that there are corporations and other business establishments that utilize a certain fraction of the natural resources yet fail to meet or at least craft proper business ethics that will guide their companys actions in the proper path. Without these ethical principles of conduct, business establishments then have all the freedom to consume everything they want more than what they need and to use them in whatever possible way one can conceive of.The protection of these natural resources should not be taken to mean as a sole responsibility of the government or of the corporations. Rather, public and private individuals should also take part in the call for the protection of the environment. Environmental groups can lobby in congress possible bills that will address the existing environmental problems or will ensure the protection of the natural resources by imposing functional sanctions to those who seek to deter the law with regard to the environment (Kinney A144). The congress is one of the most recognizable public places that give voice to individuals and groups that further goals that concern the entire nation and even the rest of the world.One of the most notable examples to the volumes of campaigns that have been pushed forward under the banner of environmental protection is the campaign of Al Gore. In his seminar documentary entitled An Inconvenient Truth, Gore discloses before the public the root causes, existing conditions, and future implications of global warming (Tenenbaum A366). His campaign does not only involve the call for a larger and more unified response from the people all over the world. Rath er, his campaign also gives full credit to the simple efforts individuals do in their homes and in their locality in order to preserve the natural resources and reverse the ill conditions that beset our natural environment today.There are still many unheard-of documentaries and seminars worldwide that seek not only to inform the public and increase their awareness on the issues that tackle natural resources but also provide alternatives and solutions to the lifestyles and habits of humanity that appear as one of the root causes of the degradation of the natural resources. It remains a fact that there are already existing efforts in countering, or at least lessening, the current environmental degradation we have today. It also sends us the idea that while there are environmental groups that seek to promote the status of the environment our natural resources can never be safely returned to its healthy state.The more important question remains how do we save our environment for the com ing generations? Before solutions can ever be thrown upon this question, one must first recognize the more essential question who has the responsibility? The answer seems obvious as the fact remains that natural resources primarily belong to the publichence, the idea that the responsibility dwells not on a single group or individual but to every other person in the world, who has existed, is existing, and will exist. Part of being human is the necessity to preserve the natural resources that contribute to the very existence of the whole humanity. Yet the list of the responsible people does not simply end there. Rather, it is only the beginning of a grander schemethat is, governments and corporations are also required to partake in the global efforts to salvage the natural resources and prevent them from eventually being consumed in whole with nothing left but memories in the basin of human forgetfulness.This brings us back to the first question posed how do we save our environment f or the generations to come? The answer may seem trivial and difficult to comprehend at first. Yet, it seems that nothing can be easier to answer than the question just given basically because human consumption necessitates human awareness of what is being consumed. What are being consumed are the natural resources of the world which belong to the public. By being aware that these natural resources are in limited supply, proper care must be given to these resources through every possible means no matter how big or how small it may be. To save the environment for the next generation means to come up with all things possible in order to prolong the remaining resources, and to come up with these things is to be able to actualize them no matter where the individual resides or what group he or she belongs to.ReferencesBach, George Leland. Economic Requisites for Economic Stability. The American Economic Review 40.2 (1950) 157.Burns, Arthur. Progress Towards Economic Stability. The America n Economic Review 50.3 (1960) 444.Cotner, Melvin L. A Policy for Public Investments in Natural Resources. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 51.1 (1969) 90.Freeman, Otis W. Natural Resources and Urban Development. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 242 (1945) 35.Kinney, Joe. Addressing Global Warming. Environmental Health Perspectives 111.3 (2003) A144.Knight, Richard L. On Improving the Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences A Comment. The Journal of Wildlife Management 57.1 (1993) 183.L., W. The Real Origins of Property in Natural Resources. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 45.2 (1986) 172.Randall, Robert H. Conservation of Natural Resources. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 206 (1939) 144.Tenenbaum, David J. Global Warming. The Soot Factor. Environmental Health Perspectives 109.8 (2001) A366.Toothman, Stephanie S. Cultural Resource Management in Natural Areas of the National Park System. The Public Historian 9.2 (1987) 69.