Sunday, April 28, 2019
Discuss Nathanael Greene's Southern campaign. Why do some historians Essay
Discuss Nathanael Greenes Southern campaign. Why do some historians view Greene as cosmos second only to Washington in importance in winning the war - Essay drillGreene was handed the responsibility of leading the then weak Revolutionary southern ground forces that had already been conduct by three commanders who failed in their duties (Golway, 2005). He was given the duty of commanding the war against the British assembly line of the south. With a small and poorly trained armament, he was up against a more established and experient British army. With the awareness that his troops were not able to win large and decisive wars, he plotted brief and sudden attacks against the prominent British army. He took a bold step to divide his army into smaller groups, forcing the British troops to do the same (Tucker, 2009). He then ordered the Continental army to retreat, and the British, without realizing the tactic used against them, followed the Continental army. This drove the Britis h army further away from their supply base, do them weaker and eventually losing the battle (Tucker, 2009).Some historians view Greene as second to Washington in the importance of winning the war because he was appointed by Washington and took orders from him (Carbone, 2008). He also succeeded where three other commanders had failed. In the same way like Washington, he was gifted with the ability to use small means to a significant advantage (Carbone,
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment