Cross Cultural Communication Essay

A country that was annexed by anformer(a)(prenominal) country is sure to fetch change or been impacted paganly and in many other aspects. An excellent typeface of this could be the British India. India was ruled oer by Britishers for around 350 years. Therefore, many traits and systems in India today argon derived from the age they were at a firster place the British rule. iodin of the most brainy illustrations of this is the schooling system and face as a medium language for statement and learning. The number of face speakers in India is more than 125 million spate (Indiaspeaks, 2010).Analyzing from the graphical record of Hofstedes cross pagan proportions of India and England, it is trenchant that or so(prenominal) countries rank closely in devil attributes which be Masculinity and precariousness Avoidance. In footing of masculinity, two countries particularly India, rank very closely to the impersonal point. India scored 56 and United Kingdom scored 66. so far though India scored very close to the middle range, it actually is a very male country specially in call of displaying success and ply (India, n.d.).However, India is also a country with ancient spiritual memoir which involves gameyness of culture and traditions that were shaped by its main religion i.e., Hinduism. This often reigns in populate from indulging in male displays to the extent that they might be prone to (India, n.d.). As for Britain, it is leaseed a masculine culture. Nevertheless, in that location is confusion among foreigners as to how erect English state value modesty and understatement and at the same meter be soaringly success driven (United Kingdom, n.d.). India scored 40 on Uncertainty Avoidance which instrument that the country has a medium low preference for avoiding uncertainty.It is due to the perception that zip has to be perfect nor has to go precisely as planned. Indians have very senior high school tolerance for the un anticipa te and is welcomed as a break from monotony (India, n.d.). They believe in the notion of adjustment and adaptation. Each smirch or problem they face pull up s scrams be handled and taken c atomic number 18 of differently. Their behaviors ar unremarkably influenced by circumstances. In this dimension the UK scored 35 which indicates that England has a low preference for avoiding uncertainty. According to Geert Hofstede, they are happy to affect it up as they go along changing plan as brand-new information comes to light. On the other hand, twain countries do have kindle differences in their scores of male monarch Distance and Individuality.Power Distance is one main dimension where twain countries have largest difference which is 42. Indian scored 77 whereas the UK scored only 35. India is strictly a large force out distant order of magnitude where hierarchy is appreciated and accepted. In this course of society, ine graphic symbol and centralization of position prevail. Privileges and condition symbols are popular. People with no power or younger are not allowed to have a voice. Parents t to each one children homage and children ought to do by parents with respect (Hofstede, n.d.) .Teachers are considered as gurus as healthy. An illustration of this can be seen from the ancient history of India where Gurus taught everything, right from schoolman to wisdom, to children and groomed them to be good valet beings. In terms of dividing line, subordinates are usually not consulted during decision- do. However, they expect to be told what to do. An noble-minded boss is a benevolent autocrat or good father (Hofstede, n.d.).The UK is a small power distance society. It is interesting to see Britain among one of the small power distance societies as Britain has a rich culture and heritage as well as the monarchy system where there are princes and princesses in the society. In small power distance same Britain, inequalities are minimized. Parents and children treat one another as equals. Teachers are experts who transfer academic knowledge and not life virtues. An ideal boss is a electionful democrat who consults his subordinates while making any decision.another(prenominal) dimension where both countries differ greatly in terms of their scores is Individuality. It is the degree of interdependence a society maintains among its members. It has to do with whether peoples self-image is defined as I or We (Hofstede, n.d.). India scored 48, therefore, it is a collectivistic society whereas Britain scored 89 which befools it a clear individualistic society. In collectivistic society, there is a high preference for belonging where individuals are expected to act in accordance with what other members of the group expect one to do. Behaviors and actions of people in this society are extremely influenced by opinions of their family, relatives and members of their social network group. In contrast, in individualistic society, people are supposed to look after themselves and their put family only (Hofstede, n.d.). British are extremely private people, children are taught to think for themselves and make their own goals in life.The path to bliss is believed to be through personal fulfillment. Another interesting aspect of culture was looked into by Deborah Tannen who wrote a parole called phrases and Linguistics where he explained a deep connection in the midst of culture and languages and how both are inter cerebrate. One aspect that Tannen stated in his book is about Crosscultural Miscommunication which is about rising and fall intonation. For English, rising intonation means oppugn and falling intonation reveals inconsiderateness and stolidity which are rude and impolite. Problem arises when business deal or agreement is to take place because this is the most crucial time when contracts are to be signed and both parties definitely do not conjure for anything to go wrong.However, just a stray of sound c an change almost the whole scenario. It shows that speakers of different cultural backgrounds increase systematically different conventions for using and rendition linguistic features (Tannen, 2005). Hence, it is very important for everybody, oddly those who work in the service expanse to recognize this difference and work towards ameliorate it. The last important aspect from Tannens theory is juicy stake and High considerateness. Since Indian society is a highly collectivistic society, it is a high involvement society as well. People in the same area will consider their neighbors as their family members. This stands true at the time of crisis people would gather and ask with touch about the story and offer suggestions and caution that they could provide.However, Britain is a private society where people are individualistic. They do not like to impose on other peoples business unless they are related or close to the person. Imposition can be taken as ill-bred or rude in so me circumstances. In conclusion, India and British are two completely different cultures that couldnt have had anything in common if British hadnt ruled India. Both countries adopted and overlap some of the good values and characteristics with each other contributing to the development of quality of life and relationship between both to prosper. Without Hofstedes dimensions and Tannens theories, cross cultural communication would still be nasty and this would hinder growth of business, tourism and cultural sectors of each and every country.ReferenceHofstede, G. (n.d.). Dimensions. In Geert Hofstede. Retrieved establish 17, 2012, from http//geert-hofstede.com/dimensions.htmlHofstede, G. (n.d.). What about India. In Geert Hofstede. Retrieved March 17, 2012, from http//geert-hofstede.com/india.htmlHofstede, G. (n.d.). What about the UK? In Geert Hofstede. Retrieved March 17, 2012, from http//geert-hofstede.com/united-kingdom.htmlIndiaspeak English is our 2nd language TNN. (2010, Mar ch 14). In The Times of India. Retrieved March 17, 2012, from The Times of India website http//articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-03-14/india/28117934_1_second-language-speakers-urdu(n.d.). HOFSTEDE Cultures And Organizations software of the Mind Web log post. Retrieved from http//westwood.wikispaces.com/file/ judgement/Hofstede.pdfTannen, D. (2005). Interactional Sociolinguistics as a resource for Intercultural Pragmatics. In Intercultural Pragnlatics (Vols. 2-2, pp. 205-208). Walter de Gruyter.Tannen, D. (2006). Language and culture. An Introduction to Language and Linguistics, 345-347.View as multi-pages